The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart demonstrates the level of donation among residents of different ages in Britain over a twenty-year period from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, a greater proportion of British citizens devoted money to charity in 1990 than in 2010. It is noticeable that the most difference in the percentage of those who gave money across two years is 18-25 group.
In 1990, those who were between 36 and 50 years old in Britain reached a peak of 42%. In contrast, solely around 17% of people from the 18-25 age group contributed to the charitable organizations which were in the last position. After two decades, both these percentages dropped remarkably, at 35% and 7% respectively. In addition, the number of people donating to the charity from the 26-35 age group experienced a decline in 2010 from 31% to 24%.
While the proportion of British people from the age of 50 and under decreased over two years, the figure witnessed an increase among the 51-65 age group from 35% to nearly 40%, which came out first in 2010. Moreover, the data for the over 65 years old was lower than that of the 51-to-65-year-old, at 35%. Nonetheless, it was still a little higher than the 1990's figure of 32%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | view | |
| 2023-01-23 | Nicole Yu | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | Punm | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exampl 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72946859903 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76924966877 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56038647343 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2263347645 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182928145325 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762083074474 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406387206517 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122851751662 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223937363909 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.