The charts give information about a number of honey-bee colonies and amount of honey production in US per decade between 1970 and 2010.
Generally, a number of honey-bee colonies and amount of honey production were fallen over a 40-year period. However, there was an exception in 1980 which colonies grew up while honey production sharply dropped.
Looking in more detail, it can be seen that, in 1970, there were 4 millions colonies which produced 130,000 tonnes honey. During the next 10 years ones approximately went up to 4.2 millions whereas the honey production decreased to 110,000 tonnes. Interestingly, in 1990 when colonies fell to 3.5 millions, honey production rose 120,000 tonnes. Also, from 1990 to 2010, both colonies and honey exponentially went down in the United States.
In a nutshell, we can conclude that honey-bee colonies fell surprisingly over the 40 years in which their productions were fluctuated, so it seemed there was not an exact relationship in their passed-time evolution.
- Today high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 97
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 69
- To learn effectively children need to eat a healthy meal at school How true is this statement Whose responsibility is it to provide food for school children 83
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 52
- Because of the busy pace of modern life many children spend most of their time indoors and have little exposure to the natural world Discuss the effects lack of experience with and understanding of nature can have on children as they grow up 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24489795918 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83812915366 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6975070902 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285376686525 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148489845933 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985231191356 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202445951574 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104110425099 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.