The chart below shows the amount of money per person per week spent on fast foods mainly on three income groups in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods from 1970 to 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer describing th
The given graphs compare the amount of money(in pence) spent by a person on a weekly basis on fast foods(hamburgers, fish and chips, and pizza) for three income groups( high, average, and low) along with their consumption trend over a period of three decades starting from 1970 in Britain.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of high and average income Britishers consumed hamburgers. Also, over the period as a whole, hamburgers led the chart followed next by pizza. However, fish and chips experienced significant downfall.
According to the given illustration, the first group spent more than 40 pence on the hamburgers compared to just 33 and 14 pence by the average and the low salaried group. Also, the average group invested nearly one-fourth on fish and chips, up by 5 pence than the other groups. In addition, whilst the highest salaried group spent nearly 20 pence on pizza, merely half of that was invested by the other two groups.
Turning to the trends, although fish and chips stood at the top rank (300 grams) in 1970, the same witnessed a sharp plummet before rising to 230 grams. On the contrary, hamburger, and pizza started with the least value, however, the former went up dramatically by more than five times(550grams), followed by the latter at 280 grams just above the fish and chips' value.
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 77
- The diagram below shows the steps of processing cocoa beans 78
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed 78
- Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on your health and on society Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for t 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a started with the least value, however, the former went up dramatically by more ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92576419214 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60946171474 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572052401747 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9018251945 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144401457447 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544234125553 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838354126763 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991192496983 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109342136376 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.