The graphs present data on the money spent by British on fast food in 1990 and the consumption of three junk food items over 30 years. The expenditure is given for each person in a week in Pence while the consumption is presented in gram per person.
As is presented in the bar graph, in 1990, British people with high-income range spent more than 40 Pence in a week on Hamburger which was higher than that of other items. They spent only 16 pence/person on Fish & Chips while around 18 pence on Pizza. Again, Hamburger was the most popular item among the medium income class. They spent over 30 pence on this item while they spent only 25 Pence on Fish & Pizza and 11 Pence/person on Pizza. Finally, among the low-income group, the fish & chips was the most popular fast food item as they spend the highest money on this (17 Pence per week by an individual). Their expenditure on the pizza was only 6 Pence.
According to the line graph, people ate pizza than any other fast food in 1970. UK citizens, in this year, devoured more than 300 grams of pizza while the consumed only 100 grams of hamburger and fish & chips. The percentage of pizza consumption started declining and reached to only 200 grams on 1990. On the contrary, the popularity of the fish and chips reached to 500 grams in 1990. Finally, the consumption of hamburger also increased and reached to around 300 grams in 1990.
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 67
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior 78
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.564 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38689524163 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0283063896 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7692307692 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160776285464 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067244232958 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075955582231 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142343067071 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079419849673 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.