The bar chart elucidates the amounts of money spent on various junk foods every week for each person as per the income levels of people in Great Britain and also the line graph depicts how much the consumption of fast foods have witnessed changes from 1970 until 1990.
Looking at the bar chart, people with high income opt for hamburgers mostly with more than 40 pence and the same scenario has happened to people with average income yet with 33 pence. Moreover, people with average and high incomes have the least interest in pizza and chips and fish respectively compared to other fast foods. Interestingly, low-income folks favor chips and fish avidly with more than 15 pence and have lower longing for pizza and hamburgers with 7 and 14 pence.
Apropos of line graph, in the specified time frame, hamburger and pizza have been always on the rise, whereas fish and chips have experienced a reduction per capita. Being more precise, in 1970, fish and chips were the most prevalent fast foods, being consumed about 300 grams and hamburger and pizza surpassed fish and chips in 1982 and 1988 respectively, reaching their pinnacles in 1990.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 60
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls In the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 & 2002. 80
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 80
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zza and hamburgers with 7 and 14 pence. Apropos of line graph, in the specified ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87179487179 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32055673567 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.2546293875 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.333333333 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163410545307 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088395584141 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105106780258 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142615783109 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12238282498 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.