The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.
The chart illustrates the percentage of illiterate male and female in the various countries for the year 2000. Female evince by Red colour, while cuss by Blue.
The chart evident that, developed countries had almost zero illiterate cuss and women. In the year 2000, Latin America had 10% of cuss illiterate, while female over 10%. Furthermore, East Asia had almost double number of uneducated female as Latin America, and East Asia had lower rate of illiterate male compare to Latin America.
Albeit, in Sub-Saharan Africa had 30% and almost 50% uneducated male and female, respectively. Later on, Over 50% of illiterate women in Arab states, where male approximately half of female. South Asia had highest rate of 50% as compare to male over of 30%, in the year of 2000.
All in all, it is appearance that, developed countries had more literate man and women compare to undeveloped countries.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-15 | dan1sland | 61 | view |
2019-07-29 | parth patel officiall | 78 | view |
2019-07-24 | PRM12 | 78 | view |
2019-07-21 | aremontika | 56 | view |
2019-07-21 | aremontika | 78 | view |
- Should developing countries concentrate on improving industrial base or should they promote education first? 67
- Many lives are in danger when hastily erected building collapse because safety standards have been sacrificed to get quick profits To prevent disaster of this kind government should play greater role in setting and enforcing safety standards for building 83
- Does travel help to promote understanding and communication between countries 53
- Forest are the lungs of the earth. Destruction of the world’s forests amount to the death of the world. We currently know to what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The diagram below show the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment.Write a report for a university lecture describing the process shown. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...pproximately half of female. South Asia had highest rate of 50% as compare to male over of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'so', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.348314606742 0.268076937826 130% => OK
Verbs: 0.0786516853933 0.116061578633 68% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0786516853933 0.0759168565197 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0393258426966 0.0366838410393 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00561797752809 0.0131127313244 43% => OK
Prepositions: 0.157303370787 0.155750635184 101% => OK
Participles: 0.00561797752809 0.0379272487307 15% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.68845355778 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0168539325843 0.0210936926555 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0505617977528 0.0948980150116 53% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00561797752809 0.00967000014798 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 898.0 1161.00487805 77% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.9 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02684563758 5.90752243213 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73763899035 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.322147651007 0.337110787985 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241610738255 0.247514529752 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.161073825503 0.171178102325 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140939597315 0.112407865282 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68845355778 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523489932886 0.546246751206 96% => OK
Word variations: 41.1379575856 49.3433353143 83% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.5555555556 23.0094962315 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0775888416 42.9750493124 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 135.714022679 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 23.0094962315 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.689975730869 48% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 40.7166293811 47.7609492067 85% => OK
Elegance: 4.13636363636 2.94281807926 141% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197904980154 0.418131533498 47% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.164830329455 0.181151798455 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0972852516088 0.0850326197045 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.666996576167 0.706616315825 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166149571642 0.157042692854 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108769054121 0.228904883108 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104845221048 0.108899403657 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.279128260386 0.367819155151 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.121519408753 0.0812612215331 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153808108765 0.316326947829 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149408091337 0.0921553760075 162% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70731707317 27% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.08536585366 171% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.02926829268 198% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.