The information given in the bar chart compares the frequency of consumers of fast food restaurant for the USA from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, as we have seen, it is evident that people that eat fast food once a week and once or twice a month was higher than others.
According to the 2003 year, the American who usually ate fast food once a week and once or twice a month was higher with around 32% that is approximately two times higher than people ate fast food several times a week and exactly 30% respectively while fast-food eaters who go to restaurants every day and never was lower than others with about 4% and exactly 5% that is lower than people went to fast food restaurants few times a year by about 13% respectively.
Between 2006 and 2013, the American eating fast food every day and never inclined to around 3% and 4% respectively whereas people who use fast food a few times a year increased to exactly 15%. Fast-food eaters who go to restaurants several times had climbed to 20% before falling to just below 15%. This pattern repeated in people who eat fast food once a week but the American eating fast food once or twice a month firstly fell to 25% and then rose to nearly 33% that is the highest proportion in the period given
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is imp 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by chienese people between 1985 and 2010. 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44978165939 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36782717245 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467248908297 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.718681239 43.030603864 281% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.833333333 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.1666666667 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333381297422 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190593463547 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733133857353 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222969170193 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07967650409 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.