The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram provides information about the number (in thousands) of UK’S student (male and females) at the university attending two different types of class (full-time and part-time) in three periods. Overall, there was an increasing trend of women participating in the part-time education system, while men experienced fluctuation. In addition, women accounted as the most participant in part-time classes compares to that of men.
In 1970/71, the figure of male part-time participants observed as the highest number in the period. It accounted for about 1,000 students in the initial year. Then, it fluctuated moderately in the following years (1980/81 and 1990/91), approximately 880 and 900 students respectively. Also, the share of full-time students increased steadily from 100 in 1970/71 to more than 250 in the final year.
The female participants in the part-time class stood just below 800 students and, increased to approximately 850 students in the following year. Finally, In 1990/91, the part-time student reached the highest number at around 1100 students. Furthermore, the number of women student in the full-time class stood at about 50 students and finished the period with four-time higher.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-31 | Nuttagrit Chakane | 78 | view |
- The graph and chart below give information about the number of new graduates and theiremployment in the UK from 1992 to 2002. 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 50
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governmentsrather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart shows unemployment rate and the number of people leaving Ireland from 1988 to 2008. 67
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.../71 to more than 250 in the final year. The female participants in the part-time...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57837837838 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99388224526 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6966384972 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242202995071 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114692541801 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683539467687 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183422177508 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697258131343 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.