The column chart compares the proportion of people who owned a house and that of pay for rent to landlords each month, in England and Wales during the period of 93 years, from1918 to 2011.
Overall, the Percentage of households who live in owned houses climbed whereas that of rental accommodation experienced an opposite trend.
Looking at the chart in more detail, it can be observed that while only about 23% of people could afford to purchase a house in 1918, the rate of people who lived in rental places were approximately 3.5 times higher. From this year to 1939, the figure for rented accommodation saw a fall of 10% while that of owned ones increased to 32%. Both figures stayed steady until 1953 and then each reached to 50% at 1971. In the subsequent year, the proportion of families who possessed a n accommodation exceeded the figure for households who pay for rents and by a rise of 19% the figure for former decreased to 65%. By contrast, by experiencing a fall of 19% the figure latter kept increasing to 35% by the end of 2011.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 95
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he proportion of families who possessed a n accommodation exceeded the figure for...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60962566845 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65243876123 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.940196742 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15336141679 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718711015538 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390983634839 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117797389582 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179027741864 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.