The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the difference between the proportion of males and females at different levels of British educational setting in 2010.
In general, women had the highest share in three types whereas men ranked first in two. The highest figures for women and men were reported in Nursery/Pre-school and university, respectively.
There was a significant difference between the proportion of males and females in Nursery/Pre-school and primary school, with the former standing first with more than 90%. In contrast, in university, the contribution of males was twice as high as that of females, as the former was responsible for the largest share with 70%.
The disparity between the two figures was almost the same in secondary school, college and private institute. However, while in the first type,women had the highest share with 55%, men accounted for the largest percentage in the last one with 55%. Regarding to college, both accounted for the same percentage, at 50%.
To sum up, as the level of educational system went up, the proportion of male teachers increased dramatically, opposed to the moderate decline in that of female one.
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge an 78
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 78
- The best way to deal with the rising problem of traffic and transportation is to encourage people to live in cities rather than in the suburbs or in the countryside To what extent do you agree 71
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment Discuss some of the arguments for and or against keeping animals in zoos Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980s and the 1990s Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, whereas, while, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13483146067 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1574433173 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533707865169 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2583324918 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12261381035 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056712639298 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311077101302 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811114020876 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173320660056 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.