The chart below shows the percentage of people different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011.
The change in four different cohorts attending cinema once a month or more in European nation from 2000 to 2011 is displayed in the line graph, shown in percentage.
Overall, youth were more likely to go to cinema than older bracket and children in that nation. Furthermore, this entertainment place gained popularity year-to-year among all brackets, with some fluctuation.
Initially, cinema were the most popular among youngsters in that European country, showing the rate at 15%. When it comes to children, the proportion of them coming to watch movies in this place accounted for one in ten, being higher than that of two adult groups in more or less one in twenty.
Eventually, the figure for the youth broke a record as the maximum data, inclining drmatically to over a half. Simultaneously, cinema were significantly more well-known increasingly in children and younger adult, sharing a similar percentage at approximately one in three. Lastly, although that for the oldest age recovered about twofold, it was still recorded as the lowest in that country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-20 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The chart shows the employment status of adults in the US in 2003 and 2013 84
- Many countries spend a lot of money to make bicycles easier Why Is it the best solution for transport problems 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2019 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, so, still, well, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23255813953 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93875652044 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662790697674 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.412577099 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244107782818 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902923357216 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910037380778 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145011265971 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973759044066 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.