The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides information about proportion of the Canada's population that visited various places divided into locals and migrants with english as a first language and others.
Overall, it is clearly seen, that cinema is the most popular choice for people in Canada, in contrast to theatre, which is the least attractive place for locals as well as for aliens. In addition, libraries and theatres are more popular among emigrants from english-speaking countries.
The half of people, with other mother tongues, has visited movie theatres in Canada, whereas the fraction of english-speaking individuals is about 68 per cent. In opposite, only one tenth of non-natives and approximately 22 per cent of natives have been in theatres.
Libraries are the most popular option for new migrants born in non-english-speaking states with 55 per cent. The rest of categories show only 37 per cent on average. The percentage of Canadians, native speaking-migrants and non-natives visited zoos are 42, 50 and 35 per cent, respectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-29 | muhammad Hamza | 70 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- The graph show British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 61
- Even though doctors advise old people to get more exercise many old people do not get enough What are the reasons for this What are some possible solutions for this 82
- Some people today argue that schools are no longer necessary because children can learn so much from the internet and be educated at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that technology has brought more harm than good Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, well, whereas, as for, in addition, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38036809816 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29031165351 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5662122402 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.097616356672 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435804542378 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473240597065 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692915719155 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469007599855 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.