The bar chart illustrates the length of phone call in 3 types (local, national and international, mobile) in the UK in 8 years period from 1995 to 2002, units are measured in billiions.
Overall, it is clear that the number of minutes for local phone call in the UK was the most as opposed to the length for mobile. Furthermore, the length for local call initially witnessed a growth but then steadily declined over the period given while a significant rose in that of the remaining categories.
The number of minutes for local call stood at around 72 billion minutes in 1995 and the increased to its peak which was exactly 90 billion minutes in 1999 before a drop to almost 73 billion minutes in 2002.
In term of national and international as well as mobile telephone call, these figures seemed gradually rose in the length for national and international call which from around 37 billion minutes in over 60 billions in 2002, and a rapid jump in the minutes for moblie in the UK over 8 years period (from under 5 billions to around 55 billion minutes) almost 10 times of the length in 2002.
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. 67
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledgeor experience 56
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59183673469 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56414988636 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484693877551 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.6304688016 43.030603864 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.0 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2 22.9334400587 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241903006094 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138896049624 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573858169188 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15946214602 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420240625248 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.