The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the account of duration of phone calls in terms of minutes in the UK based on three options during 1995 to 2002.
As described by the chart, three trends were visible throughout the period. Firstly, there was a significant rise in mobile calls with over 40 billions in 2002, which was more than four times than the data in 1995.
Secondly, although the local fixed line was used as the most telephone line for the entire period, the trend reached its peak in 1999 at 90 billion minutes of phone calls after experiencing a gradual increase and starting from 2000, the trend declined radically until it reached to a point with 70 billion minutes, which was the same with the number of phone calls from the beginning year, 1995.
As a contrary, the national and international fixed line witnessed an obvious rise in its minutes throughout the period, based on the fact that the gap between it and the local fixed calls was around 30 billion minutes in 1995 whereas it became only 10 billion minutes in 2002.
To sum up, the total minutes t of mobile calls has increased in the UK throughout the six-year period while the local fixed line faced a declining trend and the national and international fixed line faced with the opposite trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | dkhnh_2603 | view | |
| 2022-06-22 | dkhnh_2603 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | chi150901 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual Sports like Tennis Or swimming is better discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71945701357 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40525723822 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52036199095 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.642705642 43.030603864 248% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.833333333 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.8333333333 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209508420709 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119504667535 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501939450897 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134155963716 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468496995755 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.