The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015

The given bar chart details the value earned( in billion dollars) by a country in the export of five major products(petrol, engineered goods, jewelry, agriculture, and textiles. Also, the linked table highlights the proportional change in the value during 2016 as compared to the last year.

Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the export has increased significantly in all the sections except the Gem and Jewellery, which observed a marginal dip. Despite a marked positive spike in textiles, the export value of petrol and the engineered goods remained at the highest spot.

According to the given illustration, with about 3% and 8.5% rise in the value, the petroleum products, and the engineered goods led the chart by acquiring a peak value of more than 60 billion dollars. Turning to the agricultural and the textiles, the former grew with a slight uptick of only .81% reaching half a value of the highest value products. While, with a dramatic spike(up by 15.24%), the latter climbed to nearly 32 billion dollars by the period end.

On the contrary, a sharp plummet of about 5.18% slipped gem and jewelry down to value the same as earned by the textiles in 2016.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...n bar chart details the value earned in billion dollars by a country in the export of f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ven illustration, with about 3% and 8.5% rise in the value, the petroleum product...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, well, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98009950249 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74698058405 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7774217259 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.125 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203636656854 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857824530492 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567832996962 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119022942748 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671013817419 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.