The supplied chart enumerates the ways how people in one European country wasted their rubbish over four years from 2005 to 2008. Amount of wasted trash is given in millions of tonnes. It is obvious that landfill become less popular over the years, when, burning of waste showed opposite trend.
It is apparently seen for the data, that landfilling was the most used procedure to waste disposal in 2005 (1800), when in 2008 amount of rubbish disposed this way was three times less (600). As presented in the graph, almost one more time of trash have been burned in European country, when in 2005 roughly 500 and in 2008 about 900.
Getting back to the data, the way of rubbish disposal to the sea remained almost same over four years, lightly under or below 600.
To sum up, throwing rubbish to the sea was not really popular method of waste disposal, however, burning gained popularity over years.
- Many animal species are becoming extinct as a result of human activities.what are the causes and possible solutions to this problem? 56
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 86
- The trend of online shopping is increasing significantly. What effect does it have on the environment and society in general? 78
- Some people think that it is more important to build new houses than to plant trees. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, really, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 741.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71974522293 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14457756908 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611464968153 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9124723128 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295665284421 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129866895298 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999688635044 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159912463718 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10302823404 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.