The Chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain

Essay topics:

The Chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain.

The amount of hours spend by males and females on domestic charges in great Britain is what the bar graph reveals.
In general what stands out from the graph is gardening pet care bore the flag in the case of men ,while it was cooking baking,washing up that dominated the former in terms of women.
It is immediate apparent that in case of men,gardening pet care were the clear winner by covering 49.5 minutes per person per day of the total ,followed by cleaning house tidying being the first runner-up at 13 minutes per person per day clothes washing, ironing sewing, however, were found to be at the least front of the chart with a mere of 2 minutes per person per day, Though on maintenance &odd jobs they spent double time(26 minutes) per person per pay cleaning house tidying ,but on care of own children and play were spent 20 minutes weekly regards to females, the figure for cooking baking washing up and cleaning house tidying saw a rise to 74 minutes per person per day respectively, whereas clothes washing ironing sewing and care of own children and play had fall to 25 and 21 minutes per person per day orderly.
The amount of time on care of own children and play and cooking baking washing up rose sharply to 45 and 74 minutes per person per day But there was a drop, albeit a gradual in term of maintenance odd jobs

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...et care bore the flag in the case of men ,while it was cooking baking,washing up t...
^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , washing
...case of men ,while it was cooking baking,washing up that dominated the former in terms o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , gardening
...s immediate apparent that in case of men,gardening pet care were the clear winner by cover...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... minutes per person per day of the total ,followed by cleaning house tidying bein...
^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er person per day of the total ,followed by cleaning house tidying being the firs...
^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er person per pay cleaning house tidying ,but on care of own children and play wer...
^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...minutes per person per day respectively, whereas clothes washing ironing sewing a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, whereas, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48971193416 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34341093149 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506172839506 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 60.0 22.4926829268 267% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 287.440863483 43.030603864 668% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 272.75 112.824112599 242% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 60.75 22.9334400587 265% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.75 5.23603664747 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0239179046016 0.215688989381 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299165476114 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465751688957 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0299165476114 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465751688957 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.1 13.2329268293 227% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 27.5 61.2550243902 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.3 10.3012195122 236% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.65 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 26.0 10.9970731707 236% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.