the chart shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on five consumer goods in France and the UK in 2010. Units are measured in dollars.
Overall, the UK spent more money on consumer goods than France in the period given. Both the British and the French spent most of their money on cars whereas the least amount of money was spent on perfume in the UK compared to cameras in France. Furthermore, the most significant difference in expenditure between two countries was on cameras.
In terms of cars, people in the UK spent about 450 on this as opposed to the French at 400. Similarly, the British expenditure was higher on books than the French (around 400 and 300 respectively). In the UK, expenditure on cameras (just over 350) was over double that of France, which was only 150.
On the other hand, the amount of money paid out on the remaining goods in France was higher than in the UK. Above 300 was spent by the French on computers which was slightly more than the British who spent exactly 350. Neither of the countries spent much on perfume which accounted for 200 of expenditure in France but under 150 in the Uk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods To what extent do you agree 90
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 16
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, similarly, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55665024631 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39740085909 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472906403941 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4999649811 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168315952175 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765517260245 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844478363371 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125022805734 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688583073072 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.