The chart illustrates the proportion of USA people who are eating fast food at restaurants in three different years(2003,2006,2013).
Overall people who are eating once a week and once or twice a month are high in three different years. people who haven't eaten or eating daily are less in percentage. There is a slight difference between people eating daily and a few times a year.
In 2003 and 2006 the percentage of people eating daily is very low around 4%. Meanwhile, there is 15% of the variation between who are eating many times a week and once a week in 2003 and 2006. Comparing with 2003 people who eat once or twice a month are fallen in 2006. People who eat often are around 15% in 2003 and 2006. On the other hand, people who
haven't eaten in 2003 and 2006 are under 5%.
turning to 2013 people who eat daily and never eat are below 5%. As for people who eat once a week are double in number than many times a week. People who eat a few times a year ar are half in percentage when compare to people eat once or twice a month.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- underground railway systems 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...onth are high in three different years. people who havent eaten or eating daily are le...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...gh in three different years. people who havent eaten or eating daily are less in perce...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...times a week and once a week in 2003 and 2006. Comparing with 2003 people who eat...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...nd 2006. On the other hand, people who havent eaten in 2003 and 2006 are under 5%. ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Turning
...eaten in 2003 and 2006 are under 5%. turning to 2013 people who eat daily and never ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 104, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
.... As for people who eat once a week are double in number than many times a week. People who eat ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 182, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (ar) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...k. People who eat a few times a year ar are half in percentage when compare to peop...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.30964467005 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3968960491 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.406091370558 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6194360869 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.75 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18570489526 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100225813444 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717766873687 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140114893162 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947026017693 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.42 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.71 8.06136585366 71% => OK
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.