The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of men and women who teach in six different kinds of educational system in the UK in 2010
In three of the six educational levels, females outnumbered males. Female teachers made up a particularly large proportion of teacher group in three lowest education such as nursery, primary school, and secondary school. The gender gap was especially large in pre-school and primary school, where there were five times as many female teachers as male teachers
Men and women were more equally represented in higher education as a college and private training institute, as well as secondary school. In secondary school, there were nearly as many women as men, respectively 50% and 42%. This was also true of college, where the percentage of female teachers were exactly 50% equal to male teachers. In contrast, nearly 70% of men taught at university, which was more than 30% of women.
Overall, the chart shows that at lower educational system, females continue to dominate. However, males also have a significant presence in teaching in higher education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view |
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What are the causes? What are the solution? 56
- People should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet 56
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010 59
- The graph below show the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 52
- The pie chart shows a comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, well, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20903954802 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78008586161 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564971751412 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9849563335 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308062293666 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12807664053 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106395954436 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191436251619 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684935584775 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.