The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given pie chart illustrates the percentage of reasons for teenagers using their phones from 2016 to 2019 in one African nation. As it is observed, the proportion of checking social networks was a vast majority, while phone calls had the lowest percentage among 4 purposes during 4 given periods.
As it is presented in the pie chart, in 2016, half of the percentage of reasons that teenagers spend on when using their phones was checking social networking. After that, it dropped slowly from 50% to 48% from 2016 to 2017. However, between 2018 to 2019, it climbed slightly from 51% to 56%. Besides, when teenagers use their phones, the digital camera is the third most popular reason with 15% in both 2016 and 2017. Between 2017 and 2019, there was a slight rise from 15% to 20% in the proportion of using digital cameras.
On the contrary, the second most common reason for teenagers using their phones was writing and sending emails. In 2016, the percentages of the purpose of using email made up a quarter, with exactly 25%. Nevertheless, from 2016 to 2019, it started decreasing slightly by 6%. The lowest percentage of reason when teenagers use their phones through 4 years was using phone calls. In 2016, it only had 10%. After that, it increased slowly to 13% in 2017 and then continued plummeting to 5% in 2019.
In conclusion, in an African country from 2016 to 2017 the most popular reason for teenagers when using their phones is actually checking social networking.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in an African country from 2016 to 2017 the most popular reason for teenagers wh...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, however, nevertheless, second, so, then, third, while, in conclusion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81640625 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48771088439 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47265625 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.394395126 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0714285714 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279743845895 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118143223854 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08844555843 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210772443035 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175653363315 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.