This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5,000 couples.
The given line graph indicates the top eight popular destinations for British couples who recently got married in 2010. As can be seen from the graph, Thailand attracted the largest number of respondents looking for their honeymoon places while The Lake District was the least common option in the year surveyed.
Looking at the details, Thailand headed the list with 1,410 newly-wed couples regarding it as their dream honeymoon destination. This was followed by Bali, which captured the attention of 1,335 honeymooners. 750 couples of those surveyed indicated that they took interest in heading their journey in Costa Rica, compared with the lower figure standing at 600 for The Maldives.
The data of newly-married couples spending their honeymoon in The Greek Islands was roughly twice as high as that of Paris whose figure was 209 in the year 2010. The bottom of the list witnessed the presence of Spain and The Lake district, with 140 and 126 couples respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view | |
| 2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view |
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 92
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 89
- It is shown that meetings, training and discussions now happen online. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages? 89
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mmon option in the year surveyed. Looking at the details, Thailand headed ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...standing at 600 for The Maldives. The data of newly-married couples spendi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19496855346 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6105553828 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635220125786 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6324777329 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211498528816 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923723206848 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716394175034 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138443406655 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06017883961 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.