The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010
The given charts compares educational degree according to five different age groups and gender in a city in Scotland in 2010.
Overall, educational levels appeared to be directly proportional to age range and only minor differences was seen between men and women in terms of academic qualifications.
Over 70 per cent Glasgow residents aged from 16 to 50 gained university degree, this figure fell steadily to just a half with the fourth age group and a quarter with those over 75 years old. In contrast, the rate of people in Glasgow have no educational degree increased dramatically from only 9 per cent with the first three age groups to nearly three quarters with the final age group. Those attained school certificate remained relatively stable over four initial age groups at about 20 per cent, then took a free fall to only 3 per cent with those who were over 75 years old.
In terms of the pie chart, both the rate of men and women gained school certificate were the same at about 33 per cent. The proportion of Glasgow male had tertiary education was slightly higher than female, while the trend for those men and women who have no qualifications was reverse.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-26 | anhphan2511 | view | |
| 2021-11-25 | Trang Duong | 75 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | lolipop | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | quynhhuong656 | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | quynhhuong656 | 11 | view |
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the stages of processing cocoa beans 73
- The diagram below illustrates how glass is recycled Summarie the information by selecting and reporting the main features and mak Connlparills whiere relevant
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over four different seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80295566502 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61737261838 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581280788177 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.3396715478 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147937567225 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829426179616 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731158299645 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119293362695 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808075792529 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.