Given are two graphs, while the line chart compares number of people visited the UK and the number of British people went abroad during 1979 and 1999, the bar chart compares 5 different countries in terms of popularity to people in Britain in 1999.
It is clear from the line chart that the total number of British individuals went abroad far higher than those who visited the UK during the research period. Additionally, France was the most popular abroad destination among British citizens.
In 1989, approximately 12 million British people visited another country, while the number of tourists went to the UK was slightly lower, at 10 million individuals. However, the gap between two figures widened as years went on. By 1989, the number of UK residents went abroad had risen to around 30 million people, whereas the figure for foreign visitors had reached 20 million people. In 1999, there were 52 million British citizens went to another country, compared to only 28 million people visited the UK.
It is interesting to note that France had the highest number of UK visitors, with more than 10 million people, in comparison with 9 million British people visited Spain. By contrast, the figures for the USA and Greece were significantly lower, at only 4 million and 3 million people respectively. Meanwhile, only 2 million people visited Turkey were from the UK.
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Other believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit 87
- The figure gives information about smoking habit of the UK population by age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the percentage of workers in agriculture manufacturing and services in 7 European countries in 2014 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01310043668 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56159602286 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502183406114 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6530521033 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18596003974 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908041117057 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511607628461 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131877048386 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208225200823 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.