The pie graph illustrates the proportion of the three age categories in two particular countries in 2000 and predicts its in 2050.
Overall, the elderly tend to dominate in both countries. Apart from, the difference in the percentage of age groups in the top country is more considerable than the bottom country.
People at the age of further 60 is virtually a half in 2002 and seemed to increase constantly. Thus, in the projection for 2050, it would reach just below 60%. Even though the elderly is by far the most popular in Yemen and Italy, the degree of it in Italy was not significantly high as in Yemen.
The three age groups have different figures in each country. Rather, it is noticeable in Yemen than in Italy. The populations of Yemen is mostly adults and older people and its child is entirely little. There is an equal trend, on the other hand, in Italy that children, adults and elderly are higher respectively. The child figure is not too low as well.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy use Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comp 73
- c
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an make comparisions where relevant 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at the age of further 60 is virtually a half in 2002 and seemed to increase cons...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, thus, well, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64534883721 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63131981517 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610465116279 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2478794452 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.6363636364 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168782255166 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556432585169 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434557522243 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903896429133 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454346964967 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at the age of further 60 is virtually a half in 2002 and seemed to increase cons...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, thus, well, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64534883721 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63131981517 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610465116279 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2478794452 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.6363636364 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168782255166 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556432585169 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434557522243 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903896429133 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454346964967 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.