The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050
The pie charts compare the age groups of Yemen and italy residents in 2000 and what is expected after 50 years. The unit is in percentage.
Overall, in Yemen, the numbers of 60 years and above, and 15-59 year olds will increase while that of children will drop. A decline in the numbers of 15-59 years and 0-14 years is expected in italy by 2050.
Half of Yemen's population in 2000 was children but will reduce to just over one- third in 50years. Whereas, a growth of almost 10% is projected for the percentage of 15-59 year olds, which was 46.3% in 2000. Similarly, 2050 will see an improvement in the proportion of the elderlies, from 3.6% to 5.7%; the least in both years.
The people aged 15- 59 years made up two-third of italy's population in 2000, this will fall significantly to 46% by 2050. Likewise, the percentage of children will record a decrease of about 3% in future; lowest for the periods. Lastly, the number of 60years and above is foreseen to double after 50 years
- Science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years. Would it be a good or bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Being a celebrity- such as a famous film star or sports personality- brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 84
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 the information. Select and describe main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Most people in the world speak at least one foreign language. Specialists therefore have suggested that pupils should be taught foreign language from elementary classes instead of starting in high schools. This essay will explain why I believe the benefit 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...dren will record a decrease of about 3% in future; lowest for the periods. Lastly, the nu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, likewise, similarly, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55056179775 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43625977612 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7236361252 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243697732635 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930593547155 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799280230422 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159410887563 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560049709035 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.