The pie charts compare the percentage of the population by age in Yemen and Italy in 2000 and the prediction in 2050.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately clear that the citizens fell into working ages( 15-59 years old) occupied for almost the largest proportion of both two nations in two these years with an exception in Yemen in 2000.
2000 in Yemen experienced a young age distribution with a noticeably greatest rate of people aged under 14 at approximately a half, following by over 45%, 3% of inhabitants were ranges of age from 15 to 59 years and over 60 years respectively. Over 50 years, it expects an exchange in their percentages, the working group makes up a rise of over 10%. By contrast, there is a significant decline of nearly 15% in the youngest class. Beside that, the eldest people witnesses a 1% gradual increase.
an other hand, Italy had an elder in the structure of the population. The youngest age took up by far the tidiest part with about 15% in 2000 and 50 years later, this figure shrinks 3% of its rates. Meanwhile, there is a justification for the older trend, in the latter the percentage of people, who were above 60 years old, climb sharply a twice as high as it in 2000 from about 24% to 43%. Finally, a 15% drop is anticipated in the enormous remainder over this period time from just over 61%.
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 89
- The pie charts below show information on the highest level of education of women in Someland in 1945 and 1995. 61
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002, and projections for 2050. 84
- The pie chart shows information about water resources, and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Canada. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'noticeably the greatest'.
Suggestion: noticeably the greatest
...rienced a young age distribution with a noticeably greatest rate of people aged under 14 at approxi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: An
...eople witnesses a 1% gradual increase. an other hand, Italy had an elder in the s...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...eople witnesses a 1% gradual increase. an other hand, Italy had an elder in the structu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.575 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74423638438 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9586745263 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141116388449 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601743456339 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080380767604 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123734630422 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930759211809 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.