The charts below given information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts provide numerical data about the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and future plans for 2050. Overall, both these countries want the percentage of people whose age from 0-14 to decrease in the period of 2000 to 2050 but for the older people who are over 60 to increase more, whereas both countries have contradictory purposes for the increase and decrease of people in the age of 15 to 59.
It is easily indicated that in 2000, the proportion of Yemen teenagers was 50,1% and for Italy, it was too much lower: 14,3%. Therefore, Yemen and Italy decided to make this population group to decrease to 3-13% in 2050 proved by 37,0% and 11.5% for Yemen and Italian youngsters. Similarly, both nations aim for planning the growth of old-aged people in 2050 to 2-18% higher than in 2000. In addition, Italy had the majority of population was elderly people consisted of 24,1% in 2000 in compared to Yemen’s accounted for 3,6%. However, Yemen will increase to 11% for the group of average people. Whereas the people in that age group living in Italy will go down to 11% and in comparison to the percentage of Yemen average people in 2000, Italy was 11% higher.
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 73
- many students choose to ake a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 78
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 89
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 74
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65550239234 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42432216775 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502392344498 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5774520095 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269741694123 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1411555372 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624278183153 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219569842023 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194889553642 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65550239234 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42432216775 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502392344498 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5774520095 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269741694123 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1411555372 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624278183153 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219569842023 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194889553642 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.