The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons

Essay topics:

The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the percentage of electrical appliances consumed by households from 1920 to 2019, while the second line graph gives some information about the number of housework per week at the same time.
It is obvious that all of the electrical appliances have an upward trend. The electrical refrigerator consumption reached the maximum point. There was a downward trend by the number of hours of housework per week per household.

As can be seen the washing machine have increased slightly throughout the period approximately 30% from 40% except a little dropped by 1980 about 9%. Although the percentage of vacuum cleaner was under washing machine it could reach washing machine by 1960 and after that raised until the peak in 2000 and stay there until 2019. Since that the refrigerator has the minimum point in 1920, it sharply surged and pass vacuum cleaner by 1940 then passed the washing machine in 1950 and in 1980 could reach the maximum point and did not change until 2019.
It was completely inverse in the number of hours per week graph. There was a reduced steadily until 1960 around 30% and then during the end of period it declined slightly.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-13 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-03-11 oanhlilies 73 view
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 84 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...k at the same time. It is obvious that all of the electrical appliances have an upward tr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of housework per week per household. As can be seen the washing machine have in...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90954773869 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52087068698 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1309271096 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114141115511 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474548342092 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510730865751 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771404690291 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639287617416 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.