The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The first chart illustrates the variation in percentage of households owning electrical appliances from 1920 to 2019 and second one demonstrates the change in number of hours of household works done per week in those respective time period. In general, it can be concluded that as percentage of households increased the usage of electrical appliances, the number of hours invested in performing the housework has decreased.
Specifically, it is seen that the proportion of houses using refrigerator has increased rapidly from 1920 to 1980 and probably culminated during that period. Similarly, the use of vacuum cleaner also has clearly reached its maximum in 2000. The percentage of utilization of washing machine has also increased from 40% to about 75% during the time span of 1920 to 2019 but it is gradual and less rapid than the increment of refrigerator and vacuum cleaner. Furthermore, the number of hours to do house works per week such as washing, preparing meals and cleaning has reduced from 50 hours to 10 hours per week. We could credit this decrease to the corresponding increase in electrical appliances' usage but other reasons could also have played some role in it.
In an interesting note, a small decrease of 10 % is seen in the usage of washing machine from 1960 to 1980 while other two electrical appliances saw their increment steeply. However, the decrease in time to perform household works is seen in the usual proportion during this period. So, it could be inferred that use of washing machine did not have any significant role in the reduction of time invested in house works in comparison to electrical appliances mentioned in the chart.
- GRE sample issue pool essay topic 39 The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain y 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 66
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 58
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
...he corresponding increase in electrical appliances usage but other reasons could also have...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05072463768 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87210378938 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485507246377 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8335811641 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.4 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165476461064 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686563955814 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615797834518 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13082569998 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601274415923 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.