The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The first chart illustrates the variation in percentage of households owning electrical appliances from 1920 to 2019 and second one demonstrates the change in number of hours of household works done per week in those respective time period. In general, it can be concluded that as percentage of households increased the usage of electrical appliances, the number of hours invested in performing the housework has decreased.
Specifically, it is seen that the proportion of houses using refrigerator has increased rapidly from 1920 to 1980 and probably culminated during that period. Similarly, the use of vacuum cleaner also has clearly reached its maximum in 2000. The percentage of utilization of washing machine has also increased from 40% to about 75% during the time span of 1920 to 2019 but it is gradual and less rapid than the increment of refrigerator and vacuum cleaner. Furthermore, the number of hours to do house works per week such as washing, preparing meals and cleaning has reduced from 50 hours to 10 hours per week. We could credit this decrease to the corresponding increase in electrical appliances' usage but other reasons could also have played some role in it.
In an interesting note, a small decrease of 10 % is seen in the usage of washing machine from 1960 to 1980 while other two electrical appliances saw their increment steeply. However, the decrease in time to perform household works is seen in the usual proportion during this period. So, it could be inferred that use of washing machine did not have any significant role in the reduction of time invested in house works in comparison to electrical appliances mentioned in the chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-13 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- GRE sample argument pool essay topic 2 The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The 43
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The following is a recommendation from the business manager of Monarch Books Since its opening in Collegeville twenty years ago Monarch Books has developed a large customer base due to its reader friendly atmosphere and wide selection of books on all subj 62
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
...he corresponding increase in electrical appliances usage but other reasons could also have...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05072463768 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87210378938 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485507246377 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8335811641 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.4 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165476461064 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686563955814 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615797834518 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13082569998 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601274415923 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.