The given pie charts compare the amount of energy manufactured from six different sources in a particular nation between 1985 and 2003. Overall, it could easily observed that the percentage of oil occupied a significant share of the chart while there was just a mere minority of other renewable and hydrogen.
In 1985, it is explicit that the amount of oil, nuclear and natural gas overtook other sections by a wide margin. The highest proportion was seen in the category of oil with 52%, amounting to over a half of the pie chart. Following that, there was a noticeable remarkable percentage belonging to nuclear and natural, at 22% and 13% respectively. Meanwhile, the remaining categories accounted for a tiny fraction which was lower than 10%.
By 2003, oil and nuclear were two sources of energy experienced a shortfall, however, oil still hold the top. In contrast, there was an increase in other sections. The percentage of energy produced from natural gas rose by 10%, standing at the second largest portion of the chart. Other renewable and hydrogen share comparable figures, with 4% which was higher than 3% compared to 1% in 1985. In addition, coal constituted 13% as against 8% in 1985.
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'observe'
Suggestion: observe
...1985 and 2003. Overall, it could easily observed that the percentage of oil occupied a s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, still, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94554455446 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75742574257 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59900990099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8628258229 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8181818182 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188099354664 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07055276001 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783653585073 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140675367798 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609433046082 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.