The given pie charts compare the amount of energy manufactured from six different sources in a particular nation between 1985 and 2003. Overall, it could easily observed that the percentage of oil occupied a significant share of the chart while there was just a mere minority of other renewable and hydrogen.
In 1985, it is explicit that the amount of oil, nuclear and natural gas overtook other sections by a wide margin. The highest proportion was seen in the category of oil with 52%, amounting to over a half of the pie chart. Following that, there was a noticeable remarkable percentage belonging to nuclear and natural, at 22% and 13% respectively. Meanwhile, the remaining categories accounted for a tiny fraction which was lower than 10%.
By 2003, oil and nuclear were two sources of energy experienced a shortfall, however, oil still hold the top. In contrast, there was an increase in other sections. The percentage of energy produced from natural gas rose by 10%, standing at the second largest portion of the chart. Other renewable and hydrogen share comparable figures, with 4% which was higher than 3% compared to 1% in 1985. In addition, coal constituted 13% as against 8% in 1985.
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 73
- In many countries mainly tourists but not local people visit museums and historical sites Why does this happen and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
- The line graph and the bar chart give the information and forecast about the vehicle numbers and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'observe'
Suggestion: observe
...1985 and 2003. Overall, it could easily observed that the percentage of oil occupied a s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, still, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94554455446 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75742574257 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59900990099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8628258229 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8181818182 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188099354664 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07055276001 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783653585073 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140675367798 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609433046082 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.