The pie charts illustrate the proportion of workers in different positions in town A and town B over a 50-year period starting from 1960.
From an overall perspective, manufacturing was the most common job in town A in 1960, but was overtaken by services after the 50 years surveyed. Additionally, it is clear that manufacturing registered the highest figure over the period shown.
In town A in 1960, there were 41% people working in manufacturing sector, compared to 29% of services employees and 30% of sales staffs. The opposite trend can be seen clearly when looking at the town B. Manufacturing attracted the majority of workers with 70%, being significantly greater than that in town A. However, the proportion of workers in sales and services was lower than the corresponding figures in town A, accounting 20% and 10% respectively.
In the following 50 years, the figure for services sector in town A exhibited a two-times growth. Meanwhile, the percentage of people working in sales and manufacturing both dropped by half of the original numbers. Similarly, manufacturing in town B recorded a considerable decline, representing over half of the population. This was followed by the data for sales and services with roughly the same figures ( just over 20%).
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d services with roughly the same figures just over 20%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12077294686 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14024525847 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5568592948 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.3636363636 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296036207676 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117221958664 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873702914731 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19219197524 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773401800216 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.