The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010

The pie charts illustrate the proportion of workers in different positions in town A and town B over a 50-year period starting from 1960.
From an overall perspective, manufacturing was the most common job in town A in 1960, but was overtaken by services after the 50 years surveyed. Additionally, it is clear that manufacturing registered the highest figure over the period shown.
In town A in 1960, there were 41% people working in manufacturing sector, compared to 29% of services employees and 30% of sales staffs. The opposite trend can be seen clearly when looking at the town B. Manufacturing attracted the majority of workers with 70%, being significantly greater than that in town A. However, the proportion of workers in sales and services was lower than the corresponding figures in town A, accounting 20% and 10% respectively.
In the following 50 years, the figure for services sector in town A exhibited a two-times growth. Meanwhile, the percentage of people working in sales and manufacturing both dropped by half of the original numbers. Similarly, manufacturing in town B recorded a considerable decline, representing over half of the population. This was followed by the data for sales and services with roughly the same figures ( just over 20%).

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d services with roughly the same figures just over 20%.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, similarly, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12077294686 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14024525847 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5568592948 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.3636363636 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296036207676 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117221958664 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873702914731 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19219197524 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773401800216 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.