The charts compare the percentage of food spent and average meals [during 30-year period], [whereas the graph illustrates the data of average amount of food eaten in fast-food and sit-down restaurants. Overall, the number of meals consumption of both types of restaurants in the 30 years climbed.
According to the chart, the percentage of food on restaurant wasted 10% in 1985. Then, the amount increased in the following years. The amount reached 15%, 35% in 1990 and 2000 respectively. Fortunately, the budget spent on restaurant was as much as that of at home.
As we can see in the graph, the average amount of food eaten in both fast-food and sit-down restaurants were the same number 20 per year in 1980. People ate slightly more frequently, eating 5 times more at sit-down restaurants than in fast-food in 1990. The times of fast-food meal consumption was 55 while only 45 in sit-down in 2000. In 2010, the eating frequency of fast-food even doubled to 85 while just 50 in sit-down.
In conclusion, from 1980 until 2015, the number of customers spent more on fast-food in restaurants in the latter years, of which budget is bigger than the previous years.
- The diagram below shows the steps in the process of manufacturing yogurt. 11
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The diagram below shows the steps in the process of manufacturing yogurt. 56
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
... average meals [during 30-year period], [whereas the graph illustrates the data o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93434343434 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77007656042 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6455984861 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8181818182 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459556437506 0.215688989381 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174881658167 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099066356388 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282287043061 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774985371221 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.