The given charts well compare how water was distributed in use in the world. It can be clearly seen from the charts that developing countries mostly applied water for agricultural purpose, while the developed tended to be keen on using it in industrial.
The most striking figures were the demand of water for agricultural aspect in Central Asia, Africa and South East Asia regions, which were respectively 88%, 84% and 81%. Following these segments was the data of South America zone, contributing as 71% to the total water usage. Europe and North America regions had the least proportion in applying water for farming purpose, which were under 40%, respectively.
Instead of using water in agriculture, European and North American people focused on spending it on industrial aspect, with around 50% of water usage. Meanwhile, the other four regions weren't interested much on it and had nearly the same amount of water in use, within the range of 7% and 12%.
Lastly, for domestic use, America and Europe regions were all over 13% of the water used percentage, while the rests got a slight proportion, approximately 8%.
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 56
- The bar chart below shows the employment of all male and female workers by occupation in the UK, in the year 2005. 11
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 61
- The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...sage. Meanwhile, the other four regions werent interested much on it and had nearly th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, lastly, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0752688172 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65587044499 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4354497343 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162718688506 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781531731741 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385424671985 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10512199898 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326361604085 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.