The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrate, besides full-time work, the other career paths of graduates and postgraduates in the UK in 2008. Overall, a considerable number of these students chose to continue their study, while a minimum portion of them selected to do the voluntary job.
First of all, in 2008, the career choices chose by both groups shared a similar trend and the number of graduates was approximately ten times higher than that of postgraduates in each category. Precisely, advanced study was favoured by the most graduate students in the UK, for which attracted 29,665 students. Those who sought part-time jobs or still unemployed had nearly identical patterns, with the number of 17,735 and 16,235 respectively. Only 3,500 graduates were committing themselves to volunteering, representing a very insignificant proportion in the total.
As for postgraduate students, further study remained the most popular choice as 2,725 students went to higher education in 2008. This was followed by students who were part-time employed (2,535), which were slightly less than the former option. Unemployed students accounted for about one-third of the total postgraduates with the number of 1,625. A least amount of students (345) took volunteer jobs after post-graduation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | tam362 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | vivukhue | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-31 | nehatshahi | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-25 | ochirvaani | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | lssss | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- Many students leave high schools without knowing how to manage their money. What are the reasons, and how can they improve their understanding of financial management? 62
- In some countries today, people are having their first child when they are older. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What can be taken to protect them? 85
Comments
Essay evaluation report
the career choices chose by both groups
the career choices chosen by both groups
for which attracted 29,665 students
for which it attracted 29,665 students
which attracted 29,665 students
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 195 200
No. of Characters: 1042 1000
No. of Different Words: 122 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.737 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.344 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.985 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 78 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 58 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.59 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.403 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.565 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.052 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
...postgraduates with the number of 1,625. A least amount of students 345 took volun...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, still, third, while, as for, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48717948718 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0520102557 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635897435897 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2624332549 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20875374629 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824578050456 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531170251393 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149346676659 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249894750512 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.