The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

The bar graph illustrates one nation’s export earnings from five types of commodities in 2015 and 2016, while the table depicts how these values changed in percentage from the former year to the following.
Overall, in both years, the petroleum products contributed the most to the export values, whereas the exports gained the least contribution from textiles. Interestingly, apart from gems and jewellery, all other categories experienced upward trends.
While the figures for petroleum products slightly increased from 2015 to 2016 from $60 billion to approximately $62 billion, there was a marked growth in terms of engineered goods and textiles, with the latter having the smallest earnings. Exports from agricultural products almost levelled off during the given period; exports from gems and jewellery, however, were around $42 billion and $40 billion in 2015 and 2016 respectively.
Regarding the percentage change in values, agricultural products had the smallest fraction comprising of a 0.81% increase, which was followed by petroleum products with a rise of only 3%. The values of engineered goods and textiles saw a growth of 8.5% and 15.24 respectively. On the other hand, there was a 5.18% decrease in the values of gems and jewellery.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...ural products had the smallest fraction comprising of a 0.81% increase, which was followed by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, well, whereas, while, apart from, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39795918367 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93967885776 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.762330475 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210467381758 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880186580038 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620031278028 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13078203751 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559155226507 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.