The given bar charts provide information about the percentages of Australian citizens, separated by genre and age, watching two different genres of tv shows.
At a first glance, reality shows resulted to attract especially females respect to their counterpart. On the other hand, there was only a slight discrepancy between number of males and females watching tv game shows.
As data suggest, reality shows involved a widely spread age distribution of people. In fact no profound differences could be noted among different age ranges but generally, there was an increasing interest for these shows as the age of people is higher, arriving to the last age category which accounted to approximately 70%.
On the other hand, game shows in Australia gained success especially among an over forty-five years old audience. Middle age people, such as people from 25 to 44 years old, accounted to about 40%. Furthermore, the young people resulted to be the second targeted audience of game shows, with a percentage of just slightly more than 50%.
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant RE 61
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 80
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 88
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.781883299 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668639053254 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7312463928 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223840593358 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091921777625 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121046598043 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154412916383 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142362278921 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.