The given charts below give information regarding production of electricity through various types of sources throughout four different countries from 2003 to 2008.
According to the charts, it is transparently demonstrated that fossil fuel was employed by all countries in order to producing electricity. Accordingly, it is utilized as a main source of electricity production in India (82%), while 56% of electricity in Vietnam gained by fossil fuel. On the flip side, Morocco and Sweden mere took advantage of it for producing 5% and 4% of its electricity respectively.
On the other hand, Morocco benefited hydro power as a major source of acquisition of electricity by 95% and it was followed by Sweden and Vietnam with 52 and 44 percent respectively, while India only supported 14% of its electricity through hydro power. Eventually, nuclear power as a new source of energy was used substantially by (44%) for electricity produced in Sweden, although India produced only 4 percent of its electricity supply during these 5 years.
To sum up, it is distinctively obvious that the considerable sources in case of electricity was not only fossil fuel, but the hydro power was an immense root of achieving electricity in these countries.
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- You have lost an important document recently Write to your manager regarding this and say What is the document How and when did it happen What did you do regarding this matter 79
- You recently took a part-time job working for a local company. After a few weeks yourealised there were some problems with the job.Write a letter to the manager of the company. In your letter- explain why you took the job- describe the problems that you e 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, regarding, so, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25125628141 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18877383626 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572864321608 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.5126066649 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.285714286 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206195617092 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107919628028 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550119305583 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139790047402 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576397321005 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.