The charts compare standard weight of redident in Charlestown in the year 1995 and 2015.
Overall, people in 1995 had an appropriate propotion of ideal weight in most age group and many people were underweight while older people tend to have worse health in terms of weight in 2015.
Most of young people in Charlestown between 20 – 29 years old were ideal group in 2015 and 2019, but there was some people who had underweight. At 30 – 39, 40 – 49 and 50 - 59 year-old-age group, there was a mix body weight which under weight were about 25% in 1955. Interestingly, in 2015, average weight of people increased significantly, the number of overweight and obese were about 50%. Furthermore, 60 – 69 group had a big proportion of underweight group in 1995, which increasing from younger almost 2 times. On the other hand, majority of old people, 85%, were
- UK Telephone Call, by category, 1995-2002 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled.They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 715.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73509933775 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72720183478 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 188.1 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5558320122 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273744345868 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13559616114 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988050783634 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225820823355 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046590248649 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.