The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000

The line graph indicates the changes in the quantity of parcels delivered by two services namely, FedEx and TNT between 1920 and 2000.

The level of variations in Federal Express was less slight compared to the Mail Service.Moving to a more detailed analysis of the service the sending by FedEx stood at 15000 at the beginning which was three times higher than that of TNT. Following that, there was a substantial fluctuation from 1930 to 1970 by reaching a peak of almost 24000 (1940) and hitting a low of approximately 12000 (1960) being the lowest of the period as a whole by Fed Express.In contrast, over this seven decades by 1970 TNT witnessed moderate diverseties in the proportion of parcels by going up steadily, showing a small decline at the end of this period.

However, there was a rapid surge to finish at just below 25000 which is seen clearly that was the highest by Mail Service,whereas FedEx remained almost static over the last three decades.

Overall it is immediately apparent that the number of package consuming former climbed with certain fluctuations, while the latter grew substantially over the 80-year period of time.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (8 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moving
...ess slight compared to the Mail Service.Moving to a more detailed analysis of the serv...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...of the period as a whole by Fed Express.In contrast, over this seven decades by 19...
^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
...rly that was the highest by Mail Service,whereas FedEx remained almost static over the l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ter grew substantially over the 80-year period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97409326425 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77211272909 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642487046632 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.7360574128 43.030603864 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 192.0 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.6 22.9334400587 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137655323978 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810453644977 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810744412978 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944968575802 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860047573715 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.2329268293 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.