The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram details the procedures of recycling plastic bottles.

Looking from all perspectives, it is readily apparent that it involves nine stages toward the end products. The first step started by getting people to throw the bottles in the trash container. Carrying the wasted materials with a huge vehicle is regarded as the second and the third is the municipal stuff sorting out the discharged waste, i.e., separating the plastic bottles from the rest of the rubbish. Later on, the bottles are compressed into blocks, followed by crushing them between two giant wheels as the fifth step. The residuals are washed and these are transformed as plastic pellets in the six-stage. As for the seventh, the pallets are heated in order to form raw materials which is the eighth stage. Then, based on the raw material resulting, the products are made such as instant lunch-box, clothing, and recycling bags.

All in all, recycling plastic bottles has a long process which is nine in stages, and is involved both man workers and the help of machines.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-20 khanhkhanhlhp 78 view
2024-12-18 paula_ngy08 61 view
2024-11-29 Nguyen Thinh 67 view
2024-11-22 hahoaan 73 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 78 view
Essays by user Nanddy :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, then, third, as for, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01714285714 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55103020406 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634285714286 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6268779243 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14909312454 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605209929736 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517174746164 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129032854971 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371321813045 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.