The pictorial image illustrates re-cycling of water.
The process began with drain impure water in plastic barrel through a container with hand. Whereas, the barrel keep above the storage drum for better flow of clean water. Meanwhile, to filter the water from sand, charcoal and gravel barrel should put on equalizer stable level and the density level will help out to separate sand, charcoal and gravel from water.
On the other hand, on extra storage drum located below the plastic barrel, which is connected through a pipe where, all drinking water stored. Moreover, both barrel are packed with plastic lid. Finally, the dirty water is now ready to consume as drinking water.
Overall, the process is short and simple where, it is began with pouring water in plastic barrel to end up with filter clean drinking water.
- In many countries, there are 24-hour TV programs. Is it a positive or negative development ? 78
- Many people believe that family has a greater influence on a child s life and development compared to other factors such as friends TV music and so on Do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- Speed camera fines and road accident fatalities in Britain. 61
- Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and they do not change their usual habits. Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you prefer? Explain why. 67
- the diagram below shows a simple system that turns dirty water into clean water. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'begun'.
Suggestion: begun
...rocess is short and simple where, it is began with pouring water in plastic barrel to...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd up with filter clean drinking water.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, moreover, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 694.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 137.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06569343066 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42121322205 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13919677021 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5182530718 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.75 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273179809774 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135349131477 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805920156682 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18060107597 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343931501529 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.