The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram given illustrates the process of collecting rainwater in order to make use of drinking in a town in Australia.
It is clear from the diagram that there are 5 major stages to make rainwater suitable for drinking. Additionally, the manufacture begins with collecting rainwater step and ends with ready water for drinking.
At the first step, rainwater is collected on the rooves of the houses and moves to a pipe called drain. After that, it goes through a special machine called water filter, where it is filtered to remove dusts. The process continues with the step at which the water is pumped into storage launch and goes through a pipe, which leads it to a machine called water treatment.
Continually, chemicals are used to sterilise the water so as to make it pure for drinking. Next, sterial water goes to a pipe and returns to the houses, where it is drunk by people.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-21 honguyenlily 89 view
2024-01-18 honguyenlily 89 view
2023-11-06 tracywu 73 view
2023-10-19 reverjae 89 view
2023-10-19 reverjae 61 view
Essays by user 111 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...emicals are used to sterilise the water so as to make it pure for drinking. Next, steria...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75483870968 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60811189535 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6737168017 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.125 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248812556362 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118950674301 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714172922637 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173549637665 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687608589392 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.