The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The two pie charts provide data on the exploitation of energy in terms of six various household facilities in Australia as well as the amount of greenhouse gas emitted by these on average.
In total, most electricity goes for heating houses whereas water heating releases by far the largest proportion of greenhouse gas. On the other hand, cooling constitutes the lowest percentage of both energy consumption and the gas emissions.
More specifically, 42% of energy is spent on heating in the given country. Water heating comprises relatively lower share with 30%, which is twice as much as the figure of other appliances. Lighting and cooling require the lowest quantity of energy making up 4% and 2% respectively.
Turning to the air pollution caused by this energy use, water heating accounts for 32% of the emissions. Refrigeration and heating have almost the equal figure with approximately 15% for each category. Lastly, the process of cooling is more environmentally-friendly compared to that of lighting (3% for the former against 8% for the latter).
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 89
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arts provide data on the exploitation of energy in terms of six various household...
^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which is twice as much as the figure of other appliances. Lighting and cooling r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, well, whereas, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23391812865 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18569096554 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602339181287 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4218607554 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166148144568 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671932969975 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556653095866 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102462208035 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382443303604 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.