The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000
The chart compares the use of different means of transport in a European city in three different years, from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, it is evident that the number of travellers using car increased while the number of people using bike and walking decreased.
In 1960, only 5% of people went to work by car. The proportion of people using bus and bike were 17% and 25% respectively. Walking was the most popular mode of transport which accounted for nearly 35% of travellers.
Afer 40 years, the number of people travelling by car rose up dramatically to more than 35% and became the most popular mean of transport in 2000. After reaching a peak of 25% in 1980, the percentage of travellers using bus fell down to 15%, lower than that of car. The number of people going to work by bike and on foot saw a steady decline to 5% anh 10% respectively. Bike was the least popular mean of transport in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | linhtrang300304 | 78 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 67
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- A survey conducted for the places in which people gain access to the Internet from 1998 to 2004 65
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspaper will remain the most important source of news Do you argee or disagree 63
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50609756098 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54573718416 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518292682927 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9376515388 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1111111111 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292781339411 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123919541922 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118109070752 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206367637842 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142020318845 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.