The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000
The chart compares the use of different means of transport in a European city in three different years, from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, it is evident that the number of travellers using car increased while the number of people using bike and walking decreased.
In 1960, only 5% of people went to work by car. The proportion of people using bus and bike were 17% and 25% respectively. Walking was the most popular mode of transport which accounted for nearly 35% of travellers.
Afer 40 years, the number of people travelling by car rose up dramatically to more than 35% and became the most popular mean of transport in 2000. After reaching a peak of 25% in 1980, the percentage of travellers using bus fell down to 15%, lower than that of car. The number of people going to work by bike and on foot saw a steady decline to 5% anh 10% respectively. Bike was the least popular mean of transport in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | linhtrang300304 | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 75
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time Explain why you think this change has happened What are the effects of this change in attitude 92
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 85
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 38
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50609756098 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54573718416 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518292682927 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9376515388 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1111111111 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292781339411 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123919541922 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118109070752 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206367637842 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142020318845 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.