The bar chart illustrates various types of transportation used in the European city to travel to work from and also from home to working place during 1960, 1980 and 2000. Walking was mostly followed by people in 1960 to travel from home to office and office to home, whereas in 2000 bus was mostly used by the European people.
In 1960, just below 35% of people went to office walk, however, it got reduced to almost half in 1990, with just above 15% of the total travellers and the trend kept decreasing to just below 10% in 2000. With regard to travel by car, it just started at above 5 per cent in 1990, which then gradually rose to above 35 per cent in 2000 from over 20 per cent in 1980. The percentage of people travelled by bus started over 15 per cent in 1960, which then gradually improved to over 25 per cent in 1980 after which it has declined to 15 per cent in 2000. Approximately, 25 per cent of the people started to travel by car in 1960, which later dropped to over 15 per cent in 1980 and then it gradually reached just below 10 per cent in 2000.
To conclude, most of the people in the European city used the walk as a mode of transport in1960. However, as years passed by very few people urged to walk. In 2000, cars were predominately used for travel from home to work and vice versa.
- the graph shows anual no of rides taken on two forms of public trasportation in the city of williamsville 75
- Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries.what are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on the society? 56
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- "Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. But 63
- heating fuel choice according to year of costruction 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, then, whereas, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26506024096 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22841269335 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437751004016 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6067617102 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217576139957 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12250535571 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102322161283 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193525247749 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931129046575 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.