The given charts depict the amount of water used by three different sectors around the world, and water use in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Overall, the global consumption of water significantly increased between 1900 and 2000, in which the largest proportion was allocated for agricultural activities. In addition, the water use in Brazil in 2000 was much higher than that in the Congo.
In detail, agriculture needed 500 km3 of water in 1900, followed by industry and households with around one fifth of that. By 2000, the agriculture sector remained its highest position regarding water use, at 3000 km3. While a fourteenth-fold increase was witnessed in industrial use, from around 100 km3 in 1900 to 1400 km3 in 2000, the figures for homes slightly rose by 400 km3.
As can be seen from the table, in 2000, the populations of Brazil and the Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million respectively. Moreover, an individual in Brazil consumed 359 km3, considerably higher than that in the Congo with 8 km3. It is noticeable that the irrigated land in Brazil was 265 times as wide as that in the Congo, with 26,500 km2 and 100 km2 in turn.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81909547739 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73000789513 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56783919598 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0596049901 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109065351111 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562441619418 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558300681855 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878966076344 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634778957968 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.