The line graph illustrates the information about how much percent of income people expend on fuel in United State and United Kingdom.
Overall, the poor people of US spend extensive amount on fuel while the richest people spend less percent of income on petrol. However the nation of UK spend a significantly less amount of income on fuel. Although the wealthy people expend a large percent of income.
Firstly, in the start the poorest people in America spend 4% of income on fuel however it’s increased time to time and its reached more than 5% while the middle class of people spend approximately 5% in the stat and then its gradually decreased and reached almost 4% of income spend on fuel. Additionally in the beginning the richest people of America was spend around 4% of income which was equal to the poor people and after some time it was declined and finally the richest people spend below 3% of income on fuel
Secondly, the poor people of UK spend very less percent of income on petrol, which was under 1% and then its increased and arrived 2.5% of income spend on fuel while, middle class start from 2.5 percent of income and then raised up and finally they was spend around 3.8% of income on fuel and the richest person spend less amount of income on fuel than middle class which was almost 3.5%.
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health You should write at least 150 words Allow yours 61
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 61
- The chart below gives information about Istanbul Promo plus sales in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...spend less percent of income on petrol. However the nation of UK spend a significantly ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ficantly less amount of income on fuel. Although the wealthy people expend a large perce...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...ched almost 4% of income spend on fuel. Additionally in the beginning the richest people of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...nning the richest people of America was spend around 4% of income which was equal to ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...and then raised up and finally they was spend around 3.8% of income on fuel and the r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62820512821 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21536169794 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.388888888889 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 192.638406232 43.030603864 448% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.5 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 22.9334400587 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31113770813 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204159230758 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192115812249 0.0843802449381 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270052077473 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206521929887 0.0819641961636 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.