The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries
The provided line graph illustrates detailed information about the number of overseas tourist destinations in various places in the world in the 1990-2005 period.
From first glance, there were significant growths in all figures for people who arrived abroad during the 15-year.
It is noticeable that the majority of international travelers belonged to North America, at approximately 70 million in 1990. This figure was nearly 7-fold as high as people who moved to Sub-Saharan Africa during this year. Central and Eastern Europe and South-East Asia contributed the second (roughly 30 million) and the third (nearly 20 million) respectively in the first year.
Regarding the data, we can recognize that there was the largest change by over 60 million in the number of overseas visitors landing in Central and Eastern Europe throughout 15 years. As a result, North America shared equal figures for international travelers in comparison with central and Eastern Europe, which formed just under 90 million, after considerable upward trends. While having the same data at about 10 million in 1990, the figure for visitors from abroad who went to Sub-Saharan Africa was about 5 million higher than in South America in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | 100 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | polarrrr | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | polarrrr | 60 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, third, while, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29381443299 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71936896802 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8402858544 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.375 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100233227058 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461667464702 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569001654322 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746651502 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642176047825 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.