The line chart shows information about the figure of people who had a problem with diahhad in the period of 10 years from 1983 in Mashhad.
It is clear that the number of cases of diarrhea had change in this period shown. The figure of patents increased in the first 5 years and really spiked in 1889, but it finished in 1992.
In 1983, the number of patents of diarrhea was 100 people and it lightly raiseto but still stable in 1985. Then, in a short period, this number increase to double in 1987 with about 200 cases. In the next year, the number of people have this disease went down to under 100 cases and it was the lowest number in the first 5 years.
It is only 1 year after, the figure of patents went up sudently to over 400 cases and peaked in 1989 and it really became the epidemic in this period. However, this number began decrease to about over 300 people in 1992 before came back to zero in 1992 and it was the year that humans defeated this epidemic.
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history of their country Why is this What can be done to increase young people s interest in famous people in the history of their country 67
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 56
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 56
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, really, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.24864864865 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.98010558189 2.65546596893 75% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508108108108 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4906234014 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166503468196 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807615618526 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367149670538 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11109179824 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226427016137 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.67 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.